nabanjan
12-11 03:33 PM
I have this very tough situation.
I have an approved I -140 from previous employer and 6 years is over in USA.
I got a H1B transfer to a different employer last year ( 2009 ) based on this approved I 140 ( H1B was approved around Aug 2009 - given till March 2011 ).
Now I filed for another H1B transfer to another employer. But around September 2009, the previous I 140 was revoked ( this revocation is normal one and not for fraud ). I didn't know about that. So an RFE came for the new H1B transfer since my I 140 was revoked. I don't have a GC on file right now. I had the impression that normal revocation of I 140 doesn't effect H1B transfer. PLEASE HELP!! What are my options?
Thanks in Advance,
Knobby
I have an approved I -140 from previous employer and 6 years is over in USA.
I got a H1B transfer to a different employer last year ( 2009 ) based on this approved I 140 ( H1B was approved around Aug 2009 - given till March 2011 ).
Now I filed for another H1B transfer to another employer. But around September 2009, the previous I 140 was revoked ( this revocation is normal one and not for fraud ). I didn't know about that. So an RFE came for the new H1B transfer since my I 140 was revoked. I don't have a GC on file right now. I had the impression that normal revocation of I 140 doesn't effect H1B transfer. PLEASE HELP!! What are my options?
Thanks in Advance,
Knobby
wallpaper formal dress code for men.
Picasa
07-14 08:52 PM
I went to local USCIS office to expedite my EAD. I got an email from USCIS
...... Upon receipt of your request for expeditious handling, your case was reviewed and a determination was made that we need additional information to make a decision regarding your request. Please fax a letter from your employer to the following number XXX-XXX-XXXX. Please include this notice with your fax......
Do I have to send employment verification letter or something else?
Background:
Company A sponsored my GC (I was on H1B with them). Last year I joined Company B on EAD. But my previous employer told me that they will not revoke my I-140. So why USCIS is asking for letter from Employer.
...... Upon receipt of your request for expeditious handling, your case was reviewed and a determination was made that we need additional information to make a decision regarding your request. Please fax a letter from your employer to the following number XXX-XXX-XXXX. Please include this notice with your fax......
Do I have to send employment verification letter or something else?
Background:
Company A sponsored my GC (I was on H1B with them). Last year I joined Company B on EAD. But my previous employer told me that they will not revoke my I-140. So why USCIS is asking for letter from Employer.
jsb
11-15 12:03 PM
Is it okay with AOS application to take contract Job after six month of AOS filling.
I am getting a long term contract with better opportunities. How is the contract job interpreted with continuing AOS application
You can do anything, using EAD or H1B if you have one, prior to getting your GC, as long as when you are nearing your GC, your GC sponsor or some other employer, is prepared to confirm that job same/similar to what is in LC, is available for you.
I am getting a long term contract with better opportunities. How is the contract job interpreted with continuing AOS application
You can do anything, using EAD or H1B if you have one, prior to getting your GC, as long as when you are nearing your GC, your GC sponsor or some other employer, is prepared to confirm that job same/similar to what is in LC, is available for you.
2011 Bahrain#39;s men are not allowed
gchopes
07-25 09:23 AM
Hi gurus,
Effective Jul 30, 2007 USCIS direct filing address for 485 is given below -
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=eb7b5cdc2c463110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
My lawyer plans to follow these directions (for mailing the package today) and use the address -
USCIS
Texas Service Center
P.O. Box 851804
Mesquite, TX 75185-1804
as I am resident in NC.
Do I have my address correct for 485 filing?
gchopes
Effective Jul 30, 2007 USCIS direct filing address for 485 is given below -
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=eb7b5cdc2c463110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
My lawyer plans to follow these directions (for mailing the package today) and use the address -
USCIS
Texas Service Center
P.O. Box 851804
Mesquite, TX 75185-1804
as I am resident in NC.
Do I have my address correct for 485 filing?
gchopes
more...
hunkuncontrolled
03-13 06:05 PM
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Patna-girls-rare-feat-in-US-varsity/articleshow/4262665.cms.
Read this article . Now she will also join our community soon.
Read this article . Now she will also join our community soon.
Dhundhun
10-14 02:49 AM
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 1 May 2002 1 May 2002
FX 15 July 2001 15 July 2001
F2A 8 Februrary 2004 8 February 2004
F2B 15 January 2000 15 January 2000
F3 1 July 2000 1 July 2000
F4 22 July 1997 15 November 1997
E1 Current Current
E2 1 June 2003 Current
E3 1 October 2001 1 May 2005
EW 15 Janurary 2003 15 Janurary 2003
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
F1 1 May 2002 1 May 2002
FX 15 July 2001 15 July 2001
F2A 8 Februrary 2004 8 February 2004
F2B 15 January 2000 15 January 2000
F3 1 July 2000 1 July 2000
F4 22 July 1997 15 November 1997
E1 Current Current
E2 1 June 2003 Current
E3 1 October 2001 1 May 2005
EW 15 Janurary 2003 15 Janurary 2003
E4 Current Current
E4-Religious Current Current
more...
realist
10-26 11:18 AM
how much is it going for?
US can make a lot of money, if it holds an auction and invite all the gc applicants to bid :D
US can make a lot of money, if it holds an auction and invite all the gc applicants to bid :D
2010 Men#39;s dress code
gcdreamer05
01-24 08:04 AM
It is advisable to file change of status to h4 while in USA, no need to go back to india. After you get your h4 approved then you can go for stamping...
more...
newbie2020
06-23 10:45 AM
Check the status using the H1B receipt number usually EACXXXXXX or WACXXXXXX
If something has changed, The status gets changed.....kinda weird.
If something has changed, The status gets changed.....kinda weird.
hair Dress code for men:
smarth
12-16 12:38 PM
can anyone give answer to the above query?
more...
imm_pro
12-16 04:28 PM
it should not take more than 2 weeks..
hot pictures formal dress code for
sanjay02
10-29 11:57 PM
You can keep extending the H1-B till your Green card is approved.
more...
house formal dress code men. with a
Macaca
12-07 10:30 AM
Holding the Hungry Hostage (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/opinion/07fri2.html) NY Editorial, December 7, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
tattoo formal dress code for men.
Ranjeeth
06-21 01:00 AM
The USCIS announced on June 1, 2006 that the regular H-1 cap for Fiscal Year 2007 (FY2007) was reached on May 26, 2006. Those cases properly filed with the USCIS before the 26th are safe, with respect to the cap, as there are enough cap numbers for these cases. Cases that reached the USCIS on May 26th are in an uncertain situation and will be subject to a random selection process, as there are enough numbers for some, but not all of the May 26th cases. Any regular cap-subject cases received after May 26th will be rejected entirely.This information does NOT impact advanced degree cases, for which cap numbers are still available.
Further details visit: ___deleted___
Further details visit: ___deleted___
more...
pictures Men#39;s Dress Code
July2007
01-21 04:30 PM
A hypothetical question: if I discontinue my current employment, how soon will I need to get a new job/offer in order to continue the I-485 adjustment status? Currently I-485 is pending for more than 180 days.
dresses Men: White Tie, Black Tie,
gaz
04-07 12:51 PM
Hello,
Is it possible to apply for parents visa using the H1B extension receipt?
Thank you
Is it possible to apply for parents visa using the H1B extension receipt?
Thank you
more...
makeup with a proper dress code.
martinvisalaw
09-24 01:17 PM
You should bring evidence of your strong ties to the country where you live now - evidence of a job, family, house, club memberships, bank accounts, etc. Anything you can think of that would show an immigration officer that you really intend to return home at the end of this trip.
girlfriend The Dress Code is strictly
gchopes
12-29 11:23 AM
That's what even I am planning to tell them. We full time employees don't work on a specific 1 project. I have got a letter from employer with job duties. Anything else needed?
hairstyles the required dress code is
mrdinh
November 2nd, 2004, 12:48 AM
this is probably posted before but i'm too lazy to search it...when you using flash with flash wb, the image seems to warm, kinda yellowish...but use auto wb, the pic is more cool and seems right...what do you think?
nc14
03-26 03:15 PM
Great going guys!
deafTunes123
08-13 08:47 PM
Hi Gurus,
I tried checking my I-485 status over phone. I called after hours. So it went to the automated message. Thought just to listen what the message says. It was something interesting. Thought to share with you. Do any of you have the same or similar experience?
07/02/2007 - Application Receipt Date in I-485 notice.
09/04/2007 - Application Notice Date in I-485 receipt.
08/01/2007 - Application Receipt date according to the Phone Status(Automated).:confused:
09/01/2007 - Application Receipt date according to the uscis.com website Status check.:confused:
Just curious about these variations as none of these dates are matching.:confused:
I tried checking my I-485 status over phone. I called after hours. So it went to the automated message. Thought just to listen what the message says. It was something interesting. Thought to share with you. Do any of you have the same or similar experience?
07/02/2007 - Application Receipt Date in I-485 notice.
09/04/2007 - Application Notice Date in I-485 receipt.
08/01/2007 - Application Receipt date according to the Phone Status(Automated).:confused:
09/01/2007 - Application Receipt date according to the uscis.com website Status check.:confused:
Just curious about these variations as none of these dates are matching.:confused:
No comments:
Post a Comment